Aida: Towards a degrowth liminality in-between imperial and regenerative modes of living

Agana, M., Akiyama, T., Asokan, N., Garg, S., Hanada, E., Huang, Z., Martin, C., & Tsuchibuchi, Y. (2025, November 4–8). Kashiwa-no-hatake: A regenerative commons re-weaving social and ecological health [Poster presentation]. 2025 Joint Amami Symposium, Japan. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13181.42727 (external link) 

Bamber, M., Allen-Collinson, J., & McCormack, J. (2017). Occupational limbo, transitional liminality and permanent liminality: New conceptual distinctions. Human Relations, 70(12), 1514–1537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717706535 (external link)  

Barrow, G., Shaw, K., Harvey, C., Hardy, A., Kelly, A., & Bodenham, J. (2020). Experiencing liminality: An educational perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 50(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03621537.2019.1690240 (external link)  

Berque, A. (2013). Tétralemme et milieu humain: la mésologie à la lumière de Yamauchi [Tetralemma and the human environment: mesology in the light of Yamauchi]. Ebisu, 49, 57–71. 

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. 

Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2017). The imperial mode of living. In C. Spash (Ed.), Routledge handbook of ecological economics (pp. 152-161). Routledge. 

Buch-Hansen, H., & Nesterova, I. (2024). Deepgrowth: Self-transformation towards harmonious being. Ecological Economics, 224, 108281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108281 (external link)  

Carson, T. (2016). Liminal reality and transformational power: Revised edition: Transition, renewal and hope. The Lutterworth Press. 

Croucher, G., & Lacy, W. B. (2022). The emergence of academic capitalism and university neoliberalism: Perspectives of Australian higher education leadership. Higher Education, 83(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00655-7 (external link)  

D'Alisa, G., Demaria, F., & Kallis, G. (Eds.). (2014). Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era. Routledge. 

D’Alisa, G., & Kallis, G. (2020). Degrowth and the State. Ecological Economics,169, 106486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106486 (external link)  

Demaria, F., Kallis, G., & Bakker, K. (2019). Geographies of degrowth: Nowtopias, resurgences and the decolonization of imaginaries and places. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3), 431–450. 

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. 

Fanning, A. L., & Raworth, K. (2025). Doughnut of social and planetary boundaries monitors a world out of balance. Nature, 646(8083), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09385-1 (external link)  

Feldman, Z., & Sandoval, M. (2018). Metric power and the academic self: Neoliberalism, knowledge and resistance in the British university. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 16(1), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i1.899 (external link)  

Fitzpatrick, N., Parrique, T., & Cosme, I. (2022). Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764 (external link)  

Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx's theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American journal of sociology, 105(2), 366–405. 

Fromberg, C., & Lund, J. F. (2024). Tracing the contours of the ecosocial project: A review of policy proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 467, 142804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142804 (external link)  

Gould, R. K., Martinez, D. E., & Hoelting, K. R. (2023). Exploring Indigenous relationality to inform the relational turn in sustainability science. Ecosystems and People, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2229452 (external link)  

Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. 

Harvey, D. (2009). The Right to the City [PDF]. Reading Marx’s Capital with David Harvey. https://davidharvey.org/media/righttothecity.pdf (external link)  

Harvey, D. (2026). The story of capital: What everyone should know about how capital works. Verso Books. 

Hickel, J. (2019). The imperative of redistribution in an age of ecological overshoot: Human rights and global inequality. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 10(3), 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2019.0025 (external link)  

Ismi, A. (2004, July). Impoverishing a continent: The World Bank and the IMF in Africa. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. 

Jessop, B. (2017). Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities: On past research and three thought experiments. Higher education, 73(6), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0120-6 (external link)  

Johnsen, C. G. & Sorensen, B. M. (2015). It’s capitalism on coke! From temporary to permanent liminality in organization studies. Culture and Organization, 21, 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.901326 (external link)  

Kallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018). Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43(1), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941 

Katoh, K., Sakai, S., & Takahashi, T. (2009). Factors maintaining species diversity in Satoyama, a traditional agricultural landscape of Japan. Biological Conservation, 142(9), 1930–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.030 (external link)  

Kioka, N. (2014). 「あいだ」 を開く: レンマの地平 [Opening the “Aida”: The Horizon of the Lemma]. Sekaishisosha. 

Kobayashi, Y. (2025, October 1). Exploring aida (“in-between”) of humans and nature. Ecological Memes. https://www.ecologicalmemes.me/post/exploring-aida-in-between-of-humans-and-nature (external link)  

Koch, M. (2020). Structure, action and change: A Bourdieusian perspective on the preconditions for a degrowth transition. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 16(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1754693 (external link)  

Koch, M. (2022). State-civil society relations in Gramsci, Poulantzas and Bourdieu: Strategic implications for the degrowth movement. Ecological Economics, 193, 107275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107275 (external link)  

Krpan, D., Basso, F., Hickel, J. E., & Kallis, G. (2025). Assessing public support for degrowth: Survey-based experimental and predictive studies. The Lancet Planetary Health, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101326 (external link)  

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science, 136(3518), 760–764. 

Lemos, M. H. (2025). Accounting for coloniality: The case for structural colonial and climate reparations. In K. Hanaček, M. Tsagkari, & B. Roy (Eds.), Dialogues for Degrowth (pp. 8–20). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035320776.00009 (external link)  

Lundin, R.A. and Soderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U (external link)  

Marx, K. (2016). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 152–158). Routledge. 

Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647 (external link)  

Mignolo, W. D. (2020). On decoloniality: Second thoughts. Postcolonial Studies, 23(4), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2020.1751436 (external link)  

Mishan, E. J. (1993). The costs of economic growth. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. 

Ministry of the Environment, Japan (2001). Satoyama in Japan: For nature based solutions. Ministry of the Environment, Japan.  

Ministry of the Environment, Japan (2022). Study on Satochi Satoyama in Japan: Interim report. Ministry of the Environment, Japan. 

Moberg, L. (2015). The political economy of special economic zones. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(1), 167–190. 

Monticelli, L. (2018). Embodying alternatives to capitalism in the 21st century. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 16(2), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1032 (external link)  

Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718 (external link)  

Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 239–270. 

Popa, F., Guillermin, M., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2015). A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: From complex systems theory to reflexive science. Futures, 65, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002 (external link) 

Quijano, A. (2002). The return of the future and questions about knowledge. Current Sociology, 50(1). 

Rattray, J. (2016). Affective dimensions of liminality. In R., Land, J. Meyer, & M. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice (pp. 67-76). Sense Publishers. 

Richardson, M. (2025). Modelling nature connectedness within environmental systems: Human-nature relationships from 1800 to 2020 and beyond. Earth, 6(3), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth6030082 (external link)  

Saito, K. (2020). Marx’s theory of metabolism in the age of global ecological crisis. Historical Materialism, 28(2), 3–24. 

Schiller-Merkens, S. (2024). Prefiguring an alternative economy: Understanding prefigurative organizing and its struggles. Organization, 31(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221124189 (external link)  

Söderlund, J., & Borg, E. (2017). Liminality in management and organization studies: Process, position and place. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 880–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12168 (external link)  

Spash, C. L. (2021). Apologists for growth: Passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution. Globalizations, 18(7), 1123–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1824864 (external link)  

Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). GDP fetishism. The Economist’s Voice, 6(8). 

Thomassen, B. (2009). The uses and meanings of liminality. International Political Anthropology, 2, 5–27. 

Thomassen, B. (2015). Thinking with liminality. In A. Horvath, B. Thomassen, & H. Wydra (Eds.), Breaking boundaries: Varieties of liminality (pp. 39–58). Berghahn Books. 

Thomassen, B. (2016). Liminality and the modern: Living through the in-between. Routledge. 

Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge. 

Uchida, K., Matanle, P., Li, Y., Fujita, T., & Hiraiwa, M. K. (2025). Biodiversity change under human depopulation in Japan. Nature Sustainability, 8, 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01578-w (external link)  

Van Gennep, A. (1909). Les Rites de Passage [The Rights of Passage]. Emile Nourry. 

Watsuji, T. (1961). Climate and culture. (G. Bownas, Trans.) The Hokuseido Press. 

Yamauchi, T. (1974). ロゴスとレンマ[Logos and Lemma]. Iwanami Shoten.